Page 1 of 1
Halo 3 baby
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:13 pm
by Inf1n1ty
Yeah baby i got Halo 3. Limited edition ofcource
It looks unbelievable and sound even betther.
I just had to get it out of my system 8-|
Cya in space and
Scream on
True Voidian Inf.
Re: Halo 3 baby
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:53 pm
by NoMaadd
man cool halo 3
need to try it out

Re: Halo 3 baby
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:47 pm
by LIMAN
Lucky man !
How much did it cost ?
Re: Halo 3 baby
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:53 pm
by Inf1n1ty
€129.95 but worth it.
Re: Halo 3 baby
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 3:59 am
by Morey
yah, here in USA it costs $60, but it goes down to 20-30 over time
sucks, cuz my Xbox broke down

Re: Halo 3 baby
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:18 am
by Inf1n1ty
€129,95 thats the limited edition.
€69,95 is the regulair edition, but with the limited you get tons of extra's like:
Art work,
20 ours of making of.
Master chiefs helmet and a Master chief and Elite doll
+6 new weps and multiplayer skins.
The whole nine yards.
I'm a big fan of Halo so to me its 100% worthy.
Scream on
True Voidian Inf.
Re: Halo 3 baby
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:14 pm
by Morey
nice, i wonder how much it is in America so I can buy it. cuz i also love Halo, its just I dont have much money
Re: Halo 3 baby
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:16 pm
by Ramsanator
The limited Edition pack of halo runs for about $129.99 in the states.
The easiest way to acquire one is through Amazon.com/
Here you go:
Halo 3 Legendary edition through Amazon
Me, I wouldn't waste my money... but then again, I'm also one of those rare and hard-to-find "Halo-Haters."
It's my personal opinion that the game itself is mass-produced garbage that happened to hit on the right combination of graphics, easy of play, generic theme and gameplay, and chaos-fragger online to keep the multitudes amused but not thinking. Just my opinion, and an unpopular one at that.
But at least this Halo-Hater knows where to find the stuff you're looking for, right? *grin*
Re: Halo 3 baby
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:03 pm
by Inf1n1ty
Thats right Ram there are gamers that just hate the game.
Well hate is a big word, they dont know wy every halo gamer likes it so much.
To me its that you are a super soldier and everybody looks up to you in the game.
Sure the grafics are nice, but Gears of war looks betther to me.
It also has something to do with the shooting.
Halo one was the first succesfull shooter on the xbox, because the aiming is easy with the stick.
Same can be said from Freelancer.
Most -and i mean all shooters- in a plane/ship are controled by a joystick, Freelancer try'd it with a mouse and it works perfect.
There for its one of the best space shooter availeble.
Well that and the hughe amount of freedom you have in the game.
But the controls are revolutionairy.
Scream on
True Voidian, Inf.
Re: Halo 3 baby
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:16 pm
by Ramsanator
Ah, but though Halo may have been the first wildly-popular FPS fragger on the Xbox gaming console, it is NOT revolutionary in it's control by ANY stretch of the imagination (unless you're referring to Freelancer's controls, and not Halo's as revolutionary. If so, disregard)
Take a few steps back before the inception of the Xbox gaming console and you're pretty much left looking at 3 things in the preceding years:
Playstation (the original version)
Nintendo 64
Sega Dreamcast.
Sure, there were other players on the scene at that point in time, and older systems still hanging onto life, but those were the major console players.
The first game I played on Nintendo 64 was "Turok : The Dinosaur Hunter" which used the joystick of the N64 controller for aiming...
On Playstation, ports of many FPS games (including Doom, and many lesser-known games) abounded, all of them using the Dualshock analog controller's double-joystick configuration.
Sega Dreamcast also had FPS games which utilized the Dreamcast's left-thumb joystick configuration for the primary source of aiming and/or locomotion.
Since then there have been MANY variants on the Dual-analogue joystick configuration as it pertains to FPS games. As Halo comes pretty much smack-dab in the middle of the current timeline in "modern" console-based video-gaming, I can't see it being at all revolutionary in the realm of controls, as there were many other games that preceded it on various consoles that used the exact same style of control.
Re: Halo 3 baby
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:36 am
by Inf1n1ty
LOL i dint mean that the xbox was revolutionairy. Maby the Wii.
I ment that the way you can aim easy with that game on a joypad.
After Halo there were alot of games using the easy aim for console shooters.
But there are still games that make it alot easyer.
Ever play'd Call of Duty 3 on a console?
Most of the time i dont even aim and i hit something lol
Halo was only 'revolutionairy' (if thats the right word) because it proved once and for all that fps can be played on a console. Sure there are alot of other games that say the same.
Take Lotr Battle for middle earth on the console. Everybody said that an rts can't be playd on a console. Well that game proved it could and now there is a hughe stack on rts for the consoles.
But any way i already fineshd the game and it's the best Halo part ever. The story is exelent.
Cya in my scope.
Scream On
True Voidian, Inf.